Semantic quality
Evaluate relevance, correctness, usefulness, completeness and other criteria that require interpretation of language and context.
- Answer relevance
- Helpfulness and completeness
- Conversation quality
Evaluate generated answers with semantic criteria while keeping deterministic facts, execution integrity and security under explicit controls.
LLM evaluation is one layer of AI assurance. It is useful when a result requires interpretation, but it should not be treated as a universal truth signal or as a substitute for deterministic system validation.
Evaluate relevance, correctness, usefulness, completeness and other criteria that require interpretation of language and context.
Preserve the evaluation criterion, score, threshold, reason and input evidence so semantic judgments remain inspectable.
For RAG systems, evaluate retrieval quality separately from generator quality so a strong answer cannot hide poor retrieval or unsupported context.
Semantic evaluation becomes more useful when connected to the actual conversation, trace, deterministic assertions and release gate.
LLM evaluation measures generated outputs against defined quality criteria such as relevance, correctness, completeness, faithfulness or usefulness.
LLM-as-a-judge uses another model to assess an output against explicit criteria. It is a semantic evaluation mechanism, not a replacement for deterministic assertions or security controls.
Yes, provided the criteria, thresholds, evidence and failure semantics are explicit and combined with the other assurance layers required by the system.
Bring one business journey and see how Shyena maps, tests, evaluates, secures and connects the evidence to release decisions.
Request a demo