Execution integrity
Was the journey actually completed, with the required trace and tool results?
Move beyond isolated coding agents and test bots. Connect planning, implementation, testing, security, release and operational feedback in one governed engineering workflow—with evidence behind every critical decision.
Execute · Test behaviour, not just endpoints.
Combine browser and API execution with deterministic assertions and semantic evaluation of intended outcomes.
Change surface mapped
Components · dependencies · journeys
Evaluation selected
Rules + semantic criteria
Policy boundary identified
Approval invariant required
Awaiting verified evidence
No release verdict issued
Make the workflow legible. Specify the stages, evaluation criteria and release controls so the process can be reviewed and repeated.
factory:name: shyena-assurancemode: evidence-ledworkflow:- nexus # map the system- vera # test behaviour- chakra # probe security- govern # assemble evidencerelease:require_human_approval: true
Coding agents are only one part of the shift. Shyena brings the workflow around them into view—from intent and implementation to verification, security, release and operational learning.
Translate product intent, requirements and architecture into goals, constraints and measurable acceptance criteria.
$shyena assure --stage plan-design
scopeTranslate product intent, requirements and architecture into goals, constraints and measurable acceptance criteria.
evidencerequired · traceable · reviewable
nextCode & integrate
Execution integrity, deterministic assertions and semantic evaluation answer different questions. Keep the signals separate, then bring them together with policy and risk.
Was the journey actually completed, with the required trace and tool results?
Did exact facts, required steps and hard constraints hold?
Did the result meet the user’s intent when exact string matching is too brittle?
Assurance should be portable across the system being tested. Keep the workflow focused on contracts, outcomes and evidence rather than tying the decision to one model or interface.
Explore the approachStages, policies, scoring criteria and release decisions
The execution path and tools used for the task
Models and evaluation methods suited to the use case
Applications, APIs, agents, retrieval and integrations
An assurance control plane should show what is running, which evidence is missing and where human review is required. This is an illustrative roster, not a live agent connection.
A missing trace, critical policy failure or required approval should remain visible. Do not average away a hard constraint.
Start with the highest-risk path, connect the checks you need, and expand coverage as the system and its risks evolve.
Map a pull request or change to the affected system and tests.
Make checks and evidence visible alongside engineering work.
Bring test results, policy findings and approval into one decision.
The factory should make the process clearer—not hide what is implemented and what remains an example.
No. The broader mission is the Agentic SDLC: connect planning, coding agents, test engineering, security checks, release evidence and operational feedback into one governed engineering workflow. Nexus, Vera, Chakra and Govern provide the assurance capabilities within that lifecycle.
Map the risk. Test the behaviour. Challenge the boundaries. Decide with evidence.