Define test intent
Start from a business goal, persona, behavioural playbook, invariants and evidence requirements instead of a brittle transcript.
- Goals and personas
- Behavioural playbooks
- Business invariants
A practical framework for AI agent testing that separates deterministic validation, semantic evaluation, trajectory integrity, security and release evidence.
A useful AI testing framework needs to define what must be true, how the system will be observed, which judgments are deterministic or semantic, how execution integrity is proven and how failures affect release decisions.
Start from a business goal, persona, behavioural playbook, invariants and evidence requirements instead of a brittle transcript.
Keep exact facts, semantic judgments, trajectory integrity and security controls explicit so a strong score cannot hide a critical failure.
Link the test specification, agent build, environment, conversation, trace, assertions, evaluations and security findings to the final verdict.
Turn the framework into repeatable engineering workflows with CI/CD integration, exceptions and governed release policy.
At minimum: test intent, deterministic assertions, semantic evaluation where appropriate, execution-integrity checks, security controls, evidence traceability and release-gate semantics.
Exact business and system facts should be verified deterministically. Semantic evaluation is appropriate where interpretation is required. Keeping them separate makes failures more auditable.
Yes. The framework can sit alongside existing test automation, CI/CD, APIs, observability and execution engines.
Bring one business journey and see how Shyena maps, tests, evaluates, secures and connects the evidence to release decisions.
Request a demo